Hi, all.
'The Secret' DVD changed my life. Sure, if you wish for a billion dollars, it probably is not going to happen but that is not what The Secret is about for me.
The most important lesson in The Secret is to raise the energy level of yourself through always thinking about the good things, not always try to coming up with the intellectual criticism that will top the last one about how someone ripped you off years ago. In fact, the Harry Potter books even identifies this tendency as entities called Dementors.
When one thinks about things to be thankful for endlessly, at all times, knocking out the other thoughts, it just makes you feel better, and is less tiring than the alternative which is to be the intellectual complainer.
The only real geekiness is to remember cruelty, deficiency, rip offs, abuse. The only thing that is important is to remember love, to remember the thousand and one acts of kindness you have received and not the other way around!
Kindness such as the countless meals brought to my table from kindly waitresses. The money for the meal notwithstanding, the attention with which the cook prepared the meal, the meal brought to my table is an equation of kindness, an event of kindness. I remember in five cities the countless meals that I have experienced each a joy to behold and forever remember and celebrate.
So much for venality, wealth has only ever been relative.
Beauty is not only in the eye of the beholder, also, beauty is relative!
___________________________________________________________
ORGANIZED RELIGIONS REDUX
"If God did not exist, it would be necessary for man to invent Him."-Voltaire
"When everything is God, then there is no longer a God."-anonymous
"Thank God I'm an atheist!"-Woody Allen
______________________________
"Establishments do not lose their sense of purpose at the beginning. It is only once their aims are achieved that they fall into ritual and vague repetition."-Frank Herbert Dune Messiah
Once upon a time in my life, I joined a Buddhist cult.
In my opinion the value of a Buddhist meditation cult begins and ends with the meditation instruction that they offer up to the public free of charge. Such a methodology of thorough relaxation has been an indispensable boon in my life.
But after that, it becomes temple politics. In Japan, the Buddhist Church is a landowning entity.
But the institutionalized celebacy. I don't believe that one should sublimate their own natural sex drive for some puritanical denial trip.
What Nyogen Senzaki called with disdain, Cathedral Zen is the trappings of the organized religion approach to Buddhism, the robes, the sanctimonious titles like Reverend Master.
There is too much bowing and scraping in organized religions.
I believe in Zen Buddhism without the Buddhism.
With Zen Buddhism, first there is the meditation method. Meditation is an activity which religionists have monopolized and created a weird synonymity. Taking the activity of meditation and calling it Buddhist meditation is like taking the activity of baseball and calling it Buddhist baseball.
Arguably, originally, long ago, Buddhists have stolen meditation from secularists!
Organized religion is the religiousization, not religionization of the 5th D.Religionization: a noble impulse. To find the cosmic identity of all things. Religiousization: Cathedral Zen, the robes, the stuffiness, the smug smarmy group with its predesignated favourites, the sanctimonious repressed vibes from pushing a certain line that requires its more rich and gullible bourgeous benefactors to shave their heads and put on robes living some anachronistic life that was only found in 13th Century Japan.
Religion is a necessary step in mankinds evolution.
The priests in Thailand are masters at manipulating the 5th Dimension with 3D objects.
The thing with organized religion is that it creates a community, has experts that spend a lot of time with God, and the 5th Dimension practicing their own covert form of esoteric occult magics namely priests, and endorses a higher power, a highest power, God. I saw a photo of a sign in Chiang Mai that read, "physics, morality".
But it is not for everyone. Not everyone has the temperament to stomach an organized religion setting.
Why join a group and be at the bottom of their totem when you could be alone and be at the top of your totem? I would rather meditate on my own than in the context of some smug smarmy culty group.
Buddhism is trapped in its own dogmatic terminology. They use terms like sunyata, paramita, when they are really aluding to terms like quantum physics, the 5th dimension, event horizon, etherless ether, etc.
Any cult has all the hallmarks of Freudian transference, transactional analysis, philial piety, hierarchy, codependence, sublimation, etc.
Any religion, other than a Nationally endorsed religion, is a cult.
Anglicanism or Protestantism is the National religion of England and the United States. They are OK.
Protestantism and Catholicism are the National religions of Canada. And therefore, Catholicism is also OK.
Theravada Buddhism is the National religion of Thailand in the way that the head Priest is an advisor to the Monarch. Thai Buddhism is OK.
Soto Zen and Rinzai Zen are National religions of Japan. Zen is OK.
In Christian Church, the people are preached that they should do more, to be more of a Christian, to do certain things more and to do other things less. Buddhism teaches that you are not as enlightened as you should and could be. See, when you stay home and choose not to go to Church, you are not told these things.
However, the hallmark of Buddhism is compassion. "May we develop Compassion as boundless as the sky so that all beings may find rest in the clear light of their own awareness."-Tibetan Prayer. Each of us is a Buddha inside. I have a lot of friends in Thailand who are Buddhist priests.
-------------------------------------------------
Richard Dawkins is right. To believe in the JudeoChristian God makes as much sense and is as a deity is random and arbritrary as believing in the pantheon of Zeus, Athena, Persephone, etc. Dawkins said that unofficially, if you are a known atheist, you are barred from the best jobs. Richard Dawkins in the Documentary 'The God Delusion' watchable on YouTube, calls the Fundamentalist Christianity in North America, the Taliban of America. I personally, don't think the Christians are that bad, and most of them are very eclectically educated like Dan Brown. The George Bernard Shaw play, Androcles and the Lion is one that is often cited and praised by Christians, but George Bernard Shaw did not write as a satire FOR Christians as much as he wrote it as a satire ABOUT Christians.
When I joined that Buddhist cult in Vancouver called ***** **** Buddhist Priory connected to cult HQ ****** ***** in California, I should have realized that the start and the end of the usefulness of that particular group lay in the meditation instruction. After that, it degenerates into some tawdry soap opera the more you got involved with it. It was some titularly anal Priest who expects people to call him "Reverend Master" wearing robes and dickering with people's lives giving people all kinds of unsolicited advice about their lives, careers, family, etc. See, the whole premise is that the Priest poses a problem, if he has nothing else on you, it is about how your family life is not quite right, and how joining a Buddhist cult would make it better and he has the answers for that.
Remember, this is a Buddhist Priest who is a virgin and has never smoked pot and never dropped acid.
When you read their literature, it says two people of different religions can not share the same bed and in another place, it states, flirting is discouraged amongst Priory members and monastery settings. So you cant go with someone of a different religion, but flirting is discouraged with people in that same cult. Who does it leave?
At their retreats, people can not bring any literature other than the shit literature that they dispense. No newspapers and radios either. Sounds like a concentration camp.
At ***** *****, you can be expected to sit for the good part of an hour at a time. That is, sitting still with no movement. Food is watery gruel and vegetarian fare and you can expect to pay hundreds a week for this privelege.
Of course there is no pressure to donate a percentage of your paycheque on an ongoing basis. This is not even mentioned.
If you are deemed to be special and not risky enough to be thought of as a loose cannon, then there is the never implied slight niggling pressure for you to go all the way and shave your head and wear robes and join them wearing the same robes basically every day for the rest of your life.
If you enjoy the occasional toke or the weekend six-pack, you can forget that too as these people are categorically against the use of recreational drugs.
The websites do not mention it, but you are expected to address their clergy as Reverend Master while they simply call you just by your first name.
Sure, they all do meditation there but eliminate the common denominator of meditation and you are still left with the niggling differences. Better to be alone. Some people are square and do not meditate, some people meditate and are square!
I wrote the article of the 5th Dimension. If I did not come along to write it, I doubt that any of them would have. I don't know what answers they ever came up with.
As people like Richard Dawkins, Bill Maher, and Christopher Hitchens rightly see, organized religion is becoming an anachronism. It is a really a control system which utilizes group dynamics psychology to trap people with their dogmatic terminologies. Buddhists use terms like sunyata, paramita, dhyana when they really mean 5th Dimension, quantum physics, astral projection, event horizon, etherless ether, etc.
Buddhist dogma is just as bad as Christian dogma.
If I were to talk to that Buddhist Priest about the article of the 5th Dimension, he would say, "Don't worry about that, its not important, continue to train, just... just be calm. " or some bullshit like that. What a blocked individual.
Religions; all that bowing and scraping. How contemptible. They do those gestures because they got nothing else going on in there.
People do weird things in the name of religion. In the name of religions, they would sublimate their natural drives for some puritanical denial trip.
They would agree to strict vows of celibacy, issue death edicts, and agree to even kill in the name of religion! No one does these things in the name of atheism!
It is bad enough that organized religions like to tell people what to eat, ie dietary strictures, but some of them even like to tell people how to dress.
It is funny, for a culture who knows how important a dress code is to them, when that culture goes to a foreign country, they don't show gratitude to their host country by repecting the likewise dress code of their host country. Muslims and East Indians are bad at not wearing Western clothes. There is an underlying mentality behind that, one of diffidence.
The Orientals have no problem with wearing Western clothing.
Another lowest common denominator that these religions have in common is that they expect people to change their name.
It is one thing when you are a nobody, but when a famous celebrity joins a religion, after some certain point, he is expected to changes his name and it means that the guy has subjugated himself to some control group.
That Buddhist cult that I am talking about eventually assigns people a name when they are "promoted" to become one of their silly robe wearing Priests.
On a Richard Dawkins presentation on CBC, someone in the audience said that just as there are fundamentalist Christians, there must be also fundamentalist atheists.
Science says that there are no angels and no God. Religion says that evolution and parallel Universes are impossible. Each brand, science or religion has its own set of limiting strictures.
One of the reasons I do not go to Church every Sunday and would never adopt a lifestyle of doing so is because Christian Church is like a book club where instead of a limitless selection of books up for discussion, there is only one book that is discussed endlessly, over and over again, every week. The same book.
And unlike book clubs where multiple opinions are encouraged, there is only one opinion allowed about that book in a Church.
And the book in question that is being repetitively studied is a 1,900 year old to 4,000 year* old book. Why not just as vigorously study a book that was written 10,000 years ago? Why not study a book that was written 500 years ago, or 50 years ago?
*Moses existed 4,000 years ago, 1,900 years ago was when the last disciple wrote about Jesus.
It is an idea to respect and awe religion as an ultimate and state sanctioned expression of mysticism, shamanism and a way to connect with God.
Church I would go to a couple times a year for the atmosphere. Religions mainly have people who are good and trying to remain good. Religions have provided outlets feeding the poor. They have given people who are not that much into intellectualism faith, belief, courage and inspiration.
The best approach for me is to be neither atheist, nor a person belonging to any religion.
I have had too much scientific training and I read too much of Carl Jung and his idea of archetypes to ever believe in religion.
Every religion believes that they are the only truth and everybody else is misguided no matter how slightly. Buddhism is like this too, when you listen to them.
Religions are nearly unanimous in their condemnation of drug use.
Basically religion serves the same purpose as language and that is to divide and conquer. JudeoChristianity is as old as Moses who is 4,000 years old. What was there on Earth before that? Before 4,000 years ago? Not many fundamentalist Christians discuss that. They don't like to talk about the dinosaurs, let alone the Babylonians which Christianity borrowed so much from.
It is arguable whether one contacts God at a Church as much as they do a set of personalities. What is a Church but a set of personalities?
Summary: As with the Police, life would be a lot worse without Church and religion. It points to the highest archetypal ideal and there is no getting past the filters or the limitations of this dimension, ie the imperfections of socializing.
I still give money to the Church, the Salvation Army.
I used to send money to a Buddhist temple in Thailand, but since I am not interested in going there, sending money there would be to send the wrong signals. Also I do not want to maintain a psychic bridge to some place that I would rather not go to again.
In Christianity, giving money to the Church is called tithing. That is because one is expected to give ten percent. Realistically, even if you give one percent, it still counts as tithing.
In Thai Buddhism, giving money to the Church is something that is distinctly and specifically encouraged and is called making merit. The Thai Buddhist priestly tradition is one of spell making and exorcisms, but for all their superstitious vigilance, Thailand is still a very unlucky country in a few ways.
Christopher Hitchens said,
"You won't shake hands with women?! Then I won't shake hands with you!"
Hitchens was referring to the Buddhist Priests whose vows of celibacy are so profound that they can not even touch a woman's hand.
In this same tradition, people offer these priests money so that luck could be proferred in their lives.
However, a Buddhist Priest who is not allowed to touch women is hardly one who could be considered lucky, and hardly one in a tradition of dispensing good luck.
The Soto Zen Buddhist Priest in Vancouver, I am glad that I met him. I shudder to think how my life would have turned out had I not met him. Having met someone like him is more advantage than disadvantage. A very noble person. He gives the half unsolicited advice but only if you go there to his temple. If not, then he never goes out of his way to give you advice. Half unsolicited, because the person has brought themselves to the temple where they are then within arm's length, or striking distance as it were, of that Priest's priestly machinations.
This is my favourite Richard Dawkins quote which could be found on his website
http://richarddawkins.net
"Christians are essentially atheistic about every God that was ever worshipped in the past and virtually most of the Gods in religions of today. It is just that actual atheists go one God further!"
He also said that Aquarius is made up of a random collection of stars millions of light years apart and with no connection whatsoever except that what humans make, observing that particular star formation as a result of a vantage point from occupying a certain space in the Universe, and a not a particularly special place at that. His next crusade is to scientifically deconstruct New Age religions.
___________________________________________________
Notes: June 16, 2007.
Big cities are lived from the inside out, as old buildings are torn down and new buildings replaced as well as an increase in the circumference of the city perimeters. Small towns are lived from the outside in as buildings are eventually disregarded, and relationships with people get deeper.
Life in a big city is like hockey or football, a play a minute, whereas life in a small town is like golf or baseball, which one can zone out for great periods of time, to leisurely hone in when a new score is announced, otherwise, it is a very leisurely experience.
5D Note: If you never went somewhere before, your are extending your 5D coordinates, going farther away from your original hometown, even if the place is 3D geographically closer to your old home.
I am not going to slavishly reproduce these new 5D notes on "The Complete 5D" on each of my old blogs which contains that posting. My fans know what I'm talking about!
____________________________________________________________
Check This Out:
SUPERNATURAL CANNABIS PLANT GROWING
http://youtube.com/watch?search=&mode=related&v=WnjiXv3IbLw
___________________________________________________________
INTRUSIVE THOUGHTS
What I would now like to talk about pertains to what Wikipedia refers to as 'intrusive thoughts'.
In particular, I often think of phrases and worse, theme songs from televisions shows from the 70s or 80s of a particular language. The language is incidental. This could be done with any language. And as well, it could be a television show from the 50s, 60s, or 90s; that it is from the 70s and 80s is incidental. As an amateur anthropologist, I know this.
This causes me a great deal of pain, psychic pain and I have often considered a lobotomy using an Edgas Monizian brain trowel.
What is worse, I often have intrusive thoughts where I will all of a sudden remember the names of porn stars from the 80s. The DVD Tristram Shandy has a featurette 'Names of porn stars'.
This causes me pain, too. But again, these could be names of porn stars from the 50s, 60s, 90s even this decade, all incidental. Only any names in this decade are not embarassing yet, but probably will be if recalled all of a sudden a couple of decades later. The best thing is, whatever you do, try to avoid looking at the names at all through looking at pornographic websites that have only pictures and not names, or otherwise, not looking at pornography at all.
The names are incidental, and long ago, the name arrived at was probably chosen from a larger list. These days, the porn that is on the internet is largely nameless. There is no names attached to the porn stars and often they use multiple names. This is of a genre, just like culling all the character names in movies of the 70s.
And that the names are of North American porn stars is incidental too. It would be really geeky if names of porn stars from other countries are known and remembered, but thankfully in my case, I don't know, and I don't want to know!
However, I realize that these names are, far from infinite, rather finite, and there really is not more than about five dozen phrases, 70s era theme songs from ethnic television series piped in to Canadian multicultural channels, and names of porn stars from the 80s.
I take comfort in the fact that in all likelihood, I probably did not remember the name, song, or phrase accurately.
"Get a life!"
I already have a life that I very much enjoy!
One day, I will find the solution to this, as I have found the solution to all my problems. I wanted to write this mainly, that, in case the same thing is happening to you, that you are not alone.
Obviously, the cure for intrusive thoughts is to have a walkman with either a radio station, or a series of tunes and played loud. This barges in and cuts through the intrusive thoughts and changes the whole scene psychically.
The best thing to have is an iPod phone which allows you to access the internet and with the phone, be able to utilize radio streaming to download and stream a preferred radio station.
I like CBC radio 2 on Sunday mornings as there is choral music and otherwise orchestral symphony music. The internet offers choices of CBC radio 2 in all five Canadian time zones for downloading.
Music in which there is no words or otherwise words in a foreign language that I absolutely do not understand is often preferred because this type of entertainment does not tickle the left brain as much as media where I understand the language as this is less work to the brain. One can enjoy this type of entertainment without the tyranny of suggestion and meaning.
It is not good to be too cerebral. Under the Law, people can not get arrested for their thoughts unless it leads to an action that is criminal.
The only exception to this is Conspiracy to Commit Murder, but even then those thoughts would have already lead to the actions of accumulating the evidence like the presence of notes, the acquisition of weapons, etc.
It is not thoughts, but what you think about thoughts that is important.
___________________________________________________________
TO ALL THE LONELY HEARTS
There is a new movie called 'Charlie Bartlett'. He is supposedly a genius at giving advice and takes a freaky new unorthodox approach to his advices.
I however, am no slouch at giving advice and I best give advice to people who are single and still looking for love or maybe they don't care.
Here is the advice:
At the end of life, when one finally becomes a holographic, 5th dimensional being, a thoughtform, then one will see that all the years that one has wasted and 5 seconds are things that there is really no difference between. A thousand years is as an instant, as the expression goes.
In the afterlife, one would feel no more worse off for having misspent a few years than they did if they misspent 5 seconds.
And as well, it is much more bad to feel depressed about not having something than it is good to actually have it.
I heard of about half a dozen people whom I used to know who are successful and married. There are thousands, millions of people who are married, why think about these half a dozen. To think about half a dozen over millions is incidental. If I wrote a thousand word essay about how I think their lives are, I would be wrong. The details of their life - I don't know, and I don't want to know!
To envy someone for something be it a spouse, or a house, or a nice automobile, to get into that lip curling powerless expression of envy is totally contemptible.
It is much worse to get into that lip curling state about not having something than it is good to have it. Because the factors that lead a person to envy years ago are accidental and therefore incidental. That it is this thing and not another that you envy, is incidental. That is, if you envy at all. If you don't then disregard this.
Someone has something and you don't, be it a wife, or a nice house, etc.
This is an extension of the elementary school days when everybody had a certain brand something and you had to have one too. Only thing is, when you got that thing, someone either reminded you that they had a much superior model of that thing, or else the thing went out of fashion altogether, abandoned for that next expensive, semi-unattainable bauble.
It is a vicious cycle:
Me: I don't have something that everybody else has because I genuinely do not care if I have it or not. This leads to:
Other person: You don't have it? I have it. You must be stupid not to have it. Why don't you have it? This leads to:
Me: I don't have something that everybody else has because I genuinely do not care if I have it or not.
As for the other person using the word stupid, in this case, it is projection, for they would feel stupid without that thing. It is just a part of the game.
The something could be anything, fill in the blank; like a trophy wife, or a nice car, or a nice house, etc.
To feel depressed about not having something defeats the purpose of why that thing was created.
You want something. Someone else has it. That someone has a face. That face is incidental, one on an imaginary roulette wheel of all kinds of faces. The face you run into in any situation at some all of a sudden now new moment in your life is an incidental face and one that could indeed be drawn from that imaginary roulette wheel of multiple faces and that this face and not that face has emerged is again, incidental.
The factors of anything are as much accidental as incidental as it is anybody's guess what sex a baby will be the moment it is conceived. People born as males want a whole agenda of different things than people born as females. So if you really want something that you are not getting, remember that Buddha said that the cause of suffering is wanting. And that the factors that arose to make you now want that thing are incidental and accidental.
I am glad to be single. I am glad that I did not have my energy tampered with all these years through being with the wrong person like an ethnic who speaks some language other than English alot of the time, or a dissolute alcoholic, or a tobacco addict.
Anybody can say that they wasted the last ten years. But one does not live ten years at a time. One lives one day at a time, one night at a time. And these days are all made up of the decision that tonight, instead of advancing any romantic and or otherwise matrimonial endeavours, I choose to stay in my apartment alone and watch the movie channel. Day after day, night after night. Days turn into weeks which turn into months which turn into years which turn into decades. I am set in my ways!
If you have the temperament to be single, then stay with it.
If the price of not having wound up with the wrong person is being alone, then that price is worth it. You certainly don't want to be with the wrong person.
Sex is a token, tawdry, tactile choreography. Sure like the old idea goes that some babies will die without being touched. But in every batch, there is a mutant, and some babies will do better, be happier without the touches than those who have the touches.
There is a lot of hay made about sex. Sure, the sights of sex, but what about the smells of sex? It is just as good to go without it than to experience the smells that can be typically encountered during a sexual romp... some of these smells can be quite wild! And not in a good way.
And what about when the woman performs a certain act and then kisses me on the mouth afterwards? And when I perform a certain act on her and kiss her on the mouth. I am sure that she is just as disgusted! It is worse to have sex in this case than to be alone.
I don't plan on having children. I am very over-protective of my children. Ironically, the best way you can protect your potential offspring is to not have any in the first place! Protect from what? Protect from the dangers of the systemic, covert caste system of the World, and the ignorance of other people's children, the pernicious general society. Besides, this World is going to hell in a handbasket. According to Al Gore and global warming, this World will be uninhabitable in less than 50 years. 'An Inconvenient Truth', as that movie itself pointed out, they are not alluding to a preventable scenario. They are referring to a point of no return passed long ago, and what is going to happen in a few years because of that.
No point in raising children in a World in which its ecosphere is already past spoiled and doomed by the incompetence of industrialists etc.
I absolutely do not envy anyone who has children. I am glad that I never sired any offspring. Children are expensive and they are a hassle. The idea of raising children means absolutely nothing to me and I am glad that I never had any. I guess the problem is that there is no such thing as a child that is 100% yours. It is yours and hers which means it will have some of her genes as well and if you regard your woman with anything less than total admiration then that could be a problem.
I don't like children. They can be very troublesome and a never ending source of worry.
I am totally familiar with the possibility of hate that could emerge from a son to a father, so it is not difficult for me to imagine that if my child winds up having a personality that I do not like, that child could be a never ending source of derision and loathing. And that child could wind up hating me too.
Like King Lear said, How much sharper than a serpent's tooth is an ungrateful child.
In the movie Seven Years in Tibet, Brad Pitt lamented, "...better a dead father than a lousy father."
Absolutely goddamn right! I would say so!
The family is a carryover from the hunter-gatherer days. With the agrarian collective city states, I don't see why children are not raised in group homes, or collectives.*
Often parents are not qualified, either they are illiterate, or dysfunctional. In a collective, there are certified professionals. In a regular home, it is often just one or two children against a pair of much older and angry parents with marginal financial resources.
In a group home, collective, or kibbutz, it is 50 or 100 children against less than a dozen facilitators. A consensus can be raised and if treatment is objected to then a certain facilitator can arrange to be moved. Borstal Boy.
*Actually, I do see why. People in family oriented societies would work harder for and defend militarily more themselves than people in a non family, collective oriented society.
This is very deliberate. Social engineers can make any kind of society. Certain types of societies are chosen to advance certain agendas of a few very powerful.
It is much better to be single than it is to be in a terrible relationship.
I secretly wish couples the best whenever I see them. I have a few favourite friends who are couples and I have a few favourite friends who are single people.
To tell you the truth, I prefer to be alone at all times. I want to spend my evenings alone.
A single person radiates a purple aura while couples radiate a red aura. A single person is a different kind of magic. The Thai Buddhist tradition uses singleness as well as celibacy in their tradition for they believe single as well as celibate people have a different, although not better kind of magic than couples. Single people have a unique and precious magic that is directed differently than the magic of couples.
Couples are involved with the raising of a family. While single shamans are more directly involved with the non-anthropomorphic omnimorphic forces of Nature. Traditionally, in old times, single magician priests who do not have to raise children have more time to devote to study of medicine, languages, magic-craft, etc.
Single people's magic has great value in cultures that recognize it.
A single man is a different archetypal value has a different kind of archetypal intensity than a man who is part of a couple.
I have been part of a couple lots of times. As part of a couple, I often find that I have to walk slower as I have to wait for my girlfriend at all times.
I prefer to be single.
-------------------------------------------------------------
NOTE:
As George Carlin, a famous comedian, once said, "Form quick and instant opinions of people you first meet, and stick to them!"
It is just as important to know what you do not like. I have decided the kind of women I do not want to be involved with long term. Apart from a few feels, or even a one-time fling, I definitely would not want these types of women in my hair, much less living in a same place with me.
1) ethnics - I like English. Every other language is bullshit. I am not interested in the accent ehs, the accent accue, and the circumflexes of the French, I am not interested in the umlauts of the German language which is the double dots above the o's, I am not interested in the upside down question marks of Spanish.
So much for the European languages except English.
Much less do I want to deal with the Oriental languages, one of which is some vulgar sounding, tonal, monosyllabic cacophonous language and the damned alphabet that is connected with this. This language is one which will go unnamed. I could not bother to condescend to write the name of that language. I am sure you have an idea which one it is.
I mean, I am absolutely not interested in any Oriental languages which are the worst languages of all.
Why, I mean this kind of thing would be anathema to me!
As the old saying goes, "You dance with the one who brung you."
The saying is not probably not referring to the one who brung you to some place geographically as the one who brung you to some place psychically.
In Celtic spirituality, they refer to 'the thin line' as the divide between this World and the next.
In this dimension one uses physical legs. In the next dimension, one uses "psychic legs", as it were.
Some expats who live in foreign countries often go Native and actually believe, however remotely, that the much pigeoned, hole in corner language that they are speaking in whatever tin-pot banana republic they are stationed in could, would or should have any importance or relevance on the international stage even near to what English is because let's face it, people speak the language which they would like to see rule the World.
Yes indeed, people speak the language they secretly or not, would like to see rule the World.
"Everybody wants to rule the World." -Tears for Fears
The second best choice next to being alone is that I most optimally would want to be involved with a White woman.
To be honest, I am not all that much drawn to things Native and do not have more than a cursory interest in their culture. Objectively, sadly, quite a few Native women that I know are dissolute alcoholics, tobacco smokers, and talk that usually does not go beyond the grade five vocabulary and often angry talk at that, spurrilous gut-level noticings of the drunken and puerile. I often think of moving to Europe because in Europe, there isn't that "Native anger" in Europe that there is here.
But to give credit where credit is due, the Natives have treated me very well here and have given me four star treatment.
And obviously when you look at it as a whole, less than 25% of Native women are into drinking. Most Native ladies in Canada are the invisible majority living respectable middle class lives.
Still, I really want to get involved with a White woman - that is, if there is a White woman out there who would be crazy enough to take me on. I don't know if I will ever meet one whom I know well enough and one whom I think is profound. Mostly, it is too much of a hassle to try to get involved with trying to get to know people.
Because I love White culture. The philosophers, Hegel, Spinoza, Descartes, Kant, Thoreau, the scientists, Einstein, R Buckminster Fuller, Tesla, writers, Orwell, Crichton, Burroughs, Anthony Bourdain, the movies, Spielberg, Lucas, Mel Gibson, etc. and that is just for starters. I really do like the West much more than the East. The West is an intellectual smorgasbord of topical delights!
I don't know or care if I ever meet Miss Right White Girl because I like to spend my time completely alone.
However a lot of White ladies out there are ones I don't really like, so as I said, I really do prefer to be alone.
The way my life has turned out has been entirely a product of my proud choices.
2) tobacco - the putrid, sickly stale effluvium of tobacco is something that I find to be extremely contemptible. As a drug, it is about the most fascist drug going. The highs are nominal and neglible. The additives they put to it make it almost impossible to quit if you are a hard core smoker. Nic fits make it impossible to concentrate on anything for more than 40 minutes at a time.
Tobacco stinks, and the high of that drug is terrible and non-existent. It is a decidedly evil weed, and a time waster. It would seem like some kind of psychic vampirism, or at the very least a lopsided running of energy if a tobacco smoking woman were to go with me, a non-tobacco smoking man. Why she would have the better part of the bargain. That would be a rip off, an energy leech for a non-smoker to get involved with a tobacco smoker. God, I hate tobacco.
I absolutely would not want to get involved with a woman who is a tobacco smoker!
Out of politeness, I choose not to look at any women that I decided in advance are the types that I would not want to get involved with. To look at them would be to send the wrong signals. To look at them would be to be dishonest!
-----------------------------------------------
The best thing you can think about anyone is Love. That is the most important thing. Someone once said to me, You don't have to like someone but you can Love them. There are people that I would rather avoid, but I love them in absentia, and at a distance!
Often I spend my time thinking about the times people were kind to me. For example a waittress who brought food expertly prepared from a trained chef. In this instance, I could recall literally an army of waittresses and that is good memories. Memories truly worth having. I remember the joy as I sat down to sumptuous meals brought back to my lair, take-out from restaurants.
I recall hundreds of beautiful mornings waking up and holding my baby girls in my arms, my female guinea pigs.
If I meet a woman whom I have a rapport with and one whom I like in spite of myself, then that is the one I will be with. Now, as you know, I am happy to be single!
I would not care if I were single for the rest of my life.
______________________________________________________________________
CHECK THIS OUT:
Ripley's Believe It Or Not
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=70txHNWosrM
This is simply the best television program ever produced. Period.
______________________________________________________________________
O, UY
Fuck OUY all, Fuck oh, you, why, all.
A smart pundit put this one a wall in this town.
"Oh, you, why? ", might well be adopted as a second person because that is the existential predicament that fits us all...
Oh you why, caught within this solid holographic dimension vs a nonsolid holgraphic dimension, a relativistic framework of existence within a set of dimensional coordintates which guarantee a finite rather than an infinite set of experiences.
Oh, you why, that you have to go through these self imposed challenges; this existential mess.
___________________________________________________________
Dean Noble
border="0" alt="contador de visitas">contador de visitas
